Senator Ted Cruz standing before American flag with clenched fist and hangar backdrop

Cruz Threatens to Halt Federal Funding Over Defense Bill Military Flight Rules

Sen. Ted Cruz threatens to hold up federal funding until a defense bill amendment tightens military flight rules after a crash that killed 67.

First Major Point

During a Monday news conference with Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell and families of the crash victims, Cruz warned that if the defense bill passes as written he will stop federal funding to keep the government open until his bill is enacted.

Sen. Cruz speaks with stern face and crossed arms with flag and Capitol Hill backdrop and families nearby

Second Major Point

The bill contains a carve‑out that would let military aircraft return to operating without broadcasting their precise locations, a change Cruz says was added at the last moment and would undo measures by President Donald Trump and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to make the airspace around Washington, D.C. safer.

Cruz said the defense bill provision “was airdropped in at at the last moment,” noting it would unwind actions taken by President Trump and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to make the airspace around D.C. safer.

He added, “The special carve‑out was exactly what caused the January 29th crash that claimed 67 lives.”

Third Major Point

Families of the victims said the bill would weaken safeguards and reverse aviation safety progress. They stated, “Our families know the consequences of systemic failures, and we cannot accept a policy change that makes our skies less safe.”

The NTSB, which will release its final report next year, has already highlighted near‑misses and routing issues that contributed to the crash. The proposed amendment to require all aircraft to broadcast their locations has broad backing from the White House, the FAA, the NTSB, and the victims’ families.

Key Takeaways

  • Cruz threatens to halt federal funding if the defense bill passes as written.
  • The bill’s carve‑out would allow military aircraft to fly without broadcasting their locations.
  • Families and safety agencies oppose the provision and support an amendment requiring location broadcasts.

The debate highlights the tension between congressional decisions and aviation safety standards, as the U.S. seeks to prevent future tragedies.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *