Lone business figure stands with glowing carbon footprint graphs while corporate crowd holds laptops at dusk cityscape

Report: 32 Firms Drive Half of Global CO2

At a Glance

  • Just 32 fossil-fuel and cement companies produced over half of global CO₂ emissions in 2024
  • All top-10 emitters are state-owned; Saudi Aramco alone claimed 4.3 %
  • 166 linked firms released 34.7 gigatons, up 0.8 % year-on-year
  • Why it matters: Concentrated emissions put climate targets at risk and sharpen focus on corporate accountability

A new Carbon Majors database tally shows global climate damage is increasingly the work of a tiny corporate club. In 2024, only 32 firms generated more than 50 % of carbon-dioxide pollution from fossil-fuel and cement production, down from 36 the previous year. The data, compiled by InfluenceMap, covers 178 of the world’s largest oil, gas, coal and cement producers.

Concentration Intensifies

Overall emissions keep climbing even as the roster of mega-polluters shrinks. The 166 companies with traceable output released 34.7 gigatons of greenhouse gases in 2024, a 0.8 % rise over 2023. State-owned enterprises dominate the leaderboard, contributing 54.4 % of fossil-fuel CO₂ despite numbering just 70. Investor-owned companies, 93 in total, accounted for 23.7 %.

The top 10 emitters are fully or majority state-owned and together produced 27.6 % of global fossil-fuel CO₂ last year:

Split screen chart shows rising red CO2 emissions line for state companies with ExxonMobil logo while falling blue emissions
Rank Company State Share of Global Fossil-Fuel & Cement CO₂
1 Saudi Aramco Saudi Arabia 4.3 %
2-5 Four Chinese SOEs China data not itemised per firm
6-7 Two Russian firms Russia data not itemised per firm
8 ONGC India data not itemised per firm
9 NIOC Iran data not itemised per firm
10 One additional Chinese SOE China data not itemised per firm

Diverging Trends

Between 2023 and 2024, most state-owned companies increased output: 38 raised emissions, 29 cut them. Among investor-owned firms the pattern reversed-54 reduced emissions while 39 grew them. Nonetheless, the largest private oil groups still rank among the planet’s biggest polluters. ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and ConocoPhillips head the investor-owned list.

“Each year, global emissions become increasingly concentrated among a shrinking group of high-emitting producers, while overall production continues to grow,” said Emmett Connaire, lead author and senior analyst at InfluenceMap.

Legal Leverage

Historical emissions data is already shaping lawsuits and legislation. In 2025, more than a dozen U.S. states referenced Carbon Majors figures while drafting climate-superfund bills. The proposed laws would require large fossil-fuel companies to pay for protections against heatwaves, flooding and other climate impacts. Separate attribution science strengthens the link: a September 2025 Nature study found emissions traced to carbon majors drove roughly half the increase in heatwave intensity since the pre-industrial period of 1850-1900.

Key Takeaways

  • Fewer than three dozen companies control the majority of fossil-fuel and cement CO₂ output
  • State ownership dominates the highest-emitting tier, limiting shareholder pressure avenues
  • Emissions rose among most state firms but fell at a majority of private oil companies
  • Courts and regulators are using the database to assign liability and seek damages

With global temperatures still rising, pinpointing responsibility sharpens the debate over who pays for adaptation and decarbonisation. Carbon Majors plans to update its dataset annually, ensuring the spotlight stays on the powerful entities that hold disproportionate sway over the world’s climate trajectory.

Author

  • Brianna Q. Lockwood covers housing, development, and affordability for News of Austin, focusing on how growth reshapes neighborhoods. A UT Austin journalism graduate, she’s known for investigative reporting that follows money, zoning, and policy to reveal who benefits—and who gets displaced.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *